Source:www.manilastandardtoday.com
Kibitzers should stop fanning speculations that there is a rift between Finance Department and the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Whether or not there is one, what is important is for the two agencies to be able to work together to meet the country’s revenue targets and decrease the budget deficit levels that are threatening to balloon to record levels.
The intrigue about a rift was fanned earlier following talks that BIR Commissioner Sixto Esquivias IV was smarting from a reported move by the Palace to name Presidential Adviser on Revenue Enhancement Narciso Santiago as Deputy BIR Commissioner in charge of large taxpayers.
Some quarters had attempted to fan the reported animosity, fanning speculations that Esquivias was not consulted on the appointment and that the entry of Santiago was an affront to the former’s capability to meet the agency’s revenue targets.
The news of Santiago’s prospective entry into BIR, of course, later proved to be inaccurate. Santiago today remains a presidential adviser and is using whatever leverage his office has to help the BIR do its job.
And the BIR indeed needs all the help it can get.
Last May, the bureau’s collection was reportedly P4.2 billion short of its target. The deficiency for that month was double the P2-billion shortfall in the April collection.
The dim revenue picture, however, appears to have found a saving grace in the value-added tax. News reports quoted a BIR official as saying that “VAT is keeping us [BIR] afloat”.
“Without it [VAT], our collection would decrease further,” the reports quoted the BIR official.
The agency has a total goal of P850 billion for the entire year. The target has already been lowered from the initial P865.6 billion which Esquivias reportedly said “will be a tough task for the BIR”.
Given the huge target and the saving role of the BIR’s VAT collection, it seems that there is now bigger argument against a reported bid by a Malaysian-led group to get a P500-million plus VAT exemption from the BIR.
The VAT exemption bid is being worked out by some members of the board of directors of the Philippine Racing Club Inc. headed by Santiago Cua Sr. known in local Chinese circles as Cua Sing Huan and controversial Malaysian-Thai Surin Upatkoon known in Asian Chinese circles as Lau Khin Kun.
Yes, this is the same Surin Upatkoon who figured prominently in a major political controversy in Thailand after he allegedly fronted for the Singaporean giant Temasek Holdings for the takeover of the Bangkok’s Shin Corporation.
Cua, Upatkoon and several other PRCI directors had engineered the transfer of the P12-billion Sta. Ana racetrack to a paper company called JTH Davies in a swap deal that had been opposed by Filipino shareholders due to alleged lack of transparency in the transaction.
The transfer to JTH Davies, however, cannot be consummated because of the VAT implications—Cua, Upatkoon and the rest of the group have to shoulder some P500 million in VAT to have the transaction completed.
The group has opted to work out a VAT exemption from the BIR. Resigned BIR Commissioner Lilian Hefti came close to granting the exemption but the alert eyes of Finance Secretary Gary Teves caught the scheme and put his foot down.
The Cua-Upatkoon group, through a Makati-based accounting firm, wrote a strongly-worded letter to the BIR, hinting that it would take drastic legal action if the BIR does not grant the exemption.
As far as we know, up to this date, Teves has not blinked despite the Cua-Upatkoon pressure.
We hope Esquivias would likewise hold his ground. The P500 million in foregone VAT collections could spell disaster for his 2009 performance.
Already, some kibitzers are hinting that Esquivias would blink in this VAT exemption pressure play. The speculation is based on the fact that Esquivias is not an ordinary horse-racing aficionado. It appears the BIR chief was actually an owner and breeder of race horses. At one point, Commissioner Esquivias was even the president of the Samahan ng mga Horse Owners ng Pilipinas or SHOP.
Kibitzers want to infer that Esquivias is predisposed to grant the exemption because he was seen last March in an intimate huddle with PRCI executive vice president and former civil service commissioner Ramon Ereneta during the anniversary of the Philippine Racing Commission. Ereneta doubles as spokesman for the Cua-Upatkoon group.
Observers disagree with the view. Given Esquivias’ huge shortfall and humongous collection target, it is unlikely that he would give in to a bid for half-a-billion in exemptions from fellow horse racing aficionados and directly collide with the hard-line position of his boss, Teves on this issue.
That would also run counter to Esquivias’ own drive for better revenue collection. His Oplan Kandado has earned applause and is credited for boosting revenue collection.
We don’t think Esquivias would want himself to be seen as padlocking establishments with a few thousands in tax payment deficiencies while giving a giant horse racing concern half-a-billion in VAT exemptions.
Esquivias may love horses and horse racing. But it is safe to presume he loves his country more.




